Am I wrong, part 2
If you read my other post, you know I feel cheated by Hipstamp. This was the analogy I made to Mark. If you pick an item up off the shelf at Target or Walmart that you think is a bargain, but it rings up at a higher price at the register and it turns out that it was moved under a lower priced sign, or a price sticker was switched, you have to pay what it rings up as. But if the item rings up at a lower price than intended because the store programmed in the wrong price, they have to sell it to you for that price. There are laws governing these things. My contention is, the items were placed for sale, I bid on them, following the rules in place, and won. I should be allowed to pay for them. Agree or disagree?
Comments
Your outrage at Hips mistake is justified (in that they should not have listed those items in that event).
Your outrage at but getting those items for 1c or whatever it was, is not fair to the seller, which is not Hipsamp.
That is unethical behavior. I have ran my retail business on Ebay, Guns Int'l and Gun Broker. If an item sold I shipped it loss or not. Sometimes you just have to eat it. I simply choose to share the name of the seller with my felow club members and anyone who asks.
It is a shame that the owner of Hip did not honor his contract and it is also a shame that any other seller does the same.
Completely disgusting.
I also for years, more than I like to admit to LoL, have shown the front and back of an item so the customer knows what they are getting and On all sites that I have sold on I have 100% positive feedback.