Harry/Jerold, you win! It looks like it is #17

Wmk 33 Scott #159-172

How does one tell if a stamp is from the Great Britain series 159-172 or the series 187-200? I have a number of stamps with watermark 33 and others watermark 35. But my Scott catalogue mentions wat…

Michael, might want to recheck that bottom stamp. The value is in Kreuzer, which would make it Austria #14.

The bottom one is Austria (Lombardy-Venetia) Scott #13. However, check the perfs for possible reprint as indicated in the notes.

Austria #112

Can someone please tell me what (jr) refers to in the following description - #152 Used VF 1900 SCV $24.00 (jr) ???

Thank you all! These have been frustrating. And Jerold, the Belgium #19 baffles me! How could I miss it? So used to Leopold II, I guess.

Can anyone help with information on this pane of stamps from French Morocco. They are from the 1923 photogravure issue, 35 centimes but not violet (Scott #101). I have seen a gray shade in another c

All I see for French Morocco 121 is images of #122. When I go over to 122 I see more images of 122. I don't ever see any images of 121, which is a 30c turq blue overprinted. What's up with that!!! I'

Here's a picture of the back. The cancel ink doesn't have to fill the perforation holes, although it's nice if they do. Also at the Stamp club we did canceling of a specialty cover It's amazing ho…

Handstamped Galveston Tecas with S.S. Cancel. Large #10 type envelope.

Cannot find a sale or auction of a 187 blk of 4 on Cover. Can anyone help me find one? Thanks.

Errors could also come from not checking on perforations, or wishful thinking. A clear and repeated example is the confusion between Saudi Arabia (Hejaz) #L1 and #10

I am also currently dealing with an odd experience. I received a stamp back in the mail with a letter stating I had mailed him the wrong stamp. He identified the stamp I mailed as a #137, but we BOT

better minds than mine. I think I have Guernsey #1, Jersey #1 and Isle of Man #2. AM I correct?

I want to thank you, not just for your help with my "#12 prototype" question in the "Discussion" section above, but for all the time, effort, and expertise you provide to so many i

I have a stamp that a rare stamp dealer told me was a prototype of Scott #12, not the actual final issue of #12. Since there would have been substantially fewer prototypes made than the actual final i

I have a stamp that a rare stamp dealer told me was a prototype of Scott #12, not the actual final issue of #12. Since there would have been substantially fewer prototypes made than the actual final

In another auction for an Australia-Victorian(SC162) with a barred numeral post mark #849. The seller sent me a SC162, with a common cancel of #10. No ifs, buts, or thank you, and no refund or real ap