Below is the initial release of this issue. Later it was overprinted with a new value. Rather than just overprinting the value on this stamp with a bar and printing the new value on the stamp, the o

#1 is JNGELFINGEN (Württemberg)

Here I go again with 3 stamp cancels that befuddle me. Can anyone solve my dilemma?

Scott #133, Catalogue 2022

For me the #122 is among the top 10 for sure. You can keep your Trans-Mississippi, and your Columbians, this one is such a beauty.

Rene. When I first got here two years ago I found you yearning for #122. Very happy to see a conclusion that works for you. In this case I can truly say I know how you feel as I bought the other, much

#1, you have to be single, and

It's being filtered by Scott #1. (If you click on the hipvalue it will show you the listings that they are taking the values from.)

One more question, Scott #118 - 132, are they supposed to be watermarked?

I made the mistake of clicking on the link Mr. DeKornfeld graciously provided.. now I am getting e-Mails from Hipstamp.. Is Umm al Qiwain #123testScott still of interest? TestListing-8/25/2022 11:30:

Thanks again for all the feedback. The FDC with the UA letter was Artcraft and the ones from Miles Glass were all Fleetwood. I have attached the Miles Glass letter - just to show that I do think this

Can someone tell me if there is any additional value in having a very common FDC (eg - Herbert Hoover #1269) but with a letter from a business apparently offering these FDC on a regular subscription b

And why in the world would a collection like this be titled "US Scott #122 Special printing?"

I respectfully disagree....for example, you have 17 listings for US #1280 plates blocks with the same stock photo.

Wayne, here are #105 (left) and #106 (right). Despite the difference in font sizes, you can see how the T sits on the left and right arms of the V.

Let me clarify one thing. #130 is Type A10, but is unwatermarked.

I believe it's #131 (deep red)..With the pronounced grid work in the numeral and value panels, that makes me go to #131.

Bob, Taiwan #15

Actually it is an unissued stamp from a set of 15. See the note in Scott below Bangladesh set #1-8.

Bob, the other one is #157a 50s Military --- that one drove me cray-cray looking for it.