applies to the entire front of book from #1 to #5614 (as of 2022). Or you could say "Postage" which represents the Postage Set. Where as Airmail set would be C1 to C150.

By the way - I just realized you own Classic Philatelist! I have bought several stamps from you over the past year. I just received #185 (Unused NG) in the mail yesterday. It is a very nice stamp.

So upset with myself. Finally broke down and bought a #1 this weekend. The most money I have ever spent on a single stamp and forgot the get my additional entries. Now I get it. The transaction was la

than an ounce at a time, never larger than a #10 envelope. Having said all that, I have noticed that the people here in the forums are pretty good at reporting the rules as they learn of them and are

Lauree. I also have a complete set of duck stamps. All the full color ones are mint. All the earlier ones are used and signed. Expect for #1 which, being the first, was almost never signed.

My happiest day was when I bought US #1. Just so I didn’t have to search for it anymore.

Just tried a search for US #1, and was really PO’d with one dealer’s practice. All of his listings are for 6 crap used modern stamps; all the listings have meaningless mumbo jumbo in the title that d

regret when one gets away. There was a US#137 up for auction a few weeks ago. It sold for $500. Money I did not have at the time. And a stamp that was not really on my radar. It should have been. The

It's possible that they were old stock. The same idea of a "Late usage" of early US stamps (like the the example of a 5c Scott #1, which had been printed 25 years earlier, and demonetized 1

It has a single #1590 Jefferson Memorial and a strip of 3 #1299 both canceled 4-16-76 in Monticello. The date is the release date for the $2 bicentennial bill and the piece is a $2 Bicentennial Bill.

such as the recutting of plates for US#9-US#11 and to Type differences for various 1c and 2c stamps. To me, the difference between US #70 in red lilac vs. steel blue is far more interesting than a b

What does the postmark on this stamp represent? The stamp is Great Britain #180, but the postmark doesn't have a date (I don't think so, anyway). I'm wondering if it is from some sort of military out

That beaver is a little blurry but its got great margins. Is it a #4 or a #1?

On newer stamps (beginning with #1522, the first US self-adhesive stamp) what is the current trend for housing the

What I find annoying is some dealers do not put the country name in the title. If you just search on #11 you will get results of all countries with a #11. If you search on US #11 you will get only US

Oh Geez Ted! Really! Oh goodness! I "ASSUMED" I insert my ID (51541) in lue of {{private_id}}.jpg!!! Ok, Rookie mistake (#1,004)... I'll retry your expanded assistance, @Ted Tyszka ! Thanks!

a) Good thing! A couple years back we FINALLY figured out how to use the Private ID's! And yes, as we scan our images, they are saved as the Private ID #. So that part is good to go! Same here... Nume

Picked up this Canada #4 on Hip this morning. Next, I'll be looking for a #1.

But that is a very nice #15, Greg.

Scott #1000, issued in 1951, had a catalogue value of $0.20 in 2009. It may have increased to $0.50, but U.S. stamps from 1951 are less than a dime a dozen in reality, especially when selling them to